Ontology: A Difficult Keyword
dc.contributor.author | Bond, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Bessire, Lucas | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-10-19T15:14:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-10-19T15:14:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-09-25 | |
dc.description.abstract | Ontology is hard to ignore in contemporary anthropology. From conference abstracts to journal word clouds and job descriptions, ontology is fast becoming a new keyword in marquee debates as well as in the unfolding identity and direction of the discipline. Yet, as even the most sophisticated participants and observers soon realize, the word itself is elusive and polysemous. It holds in unresolved tension diverse semantic genealogies, opposed spatiotemporal scales, and various materialist registers. This animating tension couples profound insights with lively disagreements. At the very least, perhaps we can all agree: Ontology is an instrumentally difficult word. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Virtual Issue, American Ethnologist, Ontology in American Ethnologist, 1980–2014 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11209/10468 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
dc.title | Ontology: A Difficult Keyword | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Ontology- A Difficult Keyword.pdf
- Size:
- 117.29 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: