2017-11-132017-11-131964-11-11http://hdl.handle.net/11209/11616"Wohnus disputed a statement made two weeks ago by Atty. Francis E. Morrissey....Wohnus said there are significant quantities of fibers still going into the stream and to prove his point he produced two gallon samples of river water, one a clear one taken from above the tissue plant dam, the other downstream from the plant. The latter was cloudy with suspended clays from the paper-making process, ..and the filmy sediment which was settled at the bottom of the gallon jug was fiber waste."en-USWalloomsac RiverPollutionScience DivisionScience FacultyBiologyBiologistWohnus, John FrederickVermont Tissue MillWalloomsac Pollution Protested by BiologistArticle